WHO REALLY WROTE I HEARD THE BELLS ON CHRISTMAS DAY? - By Douglas M. Campbell
Henry Wadsworth
Longfellow did not write the Christmas carol “I Heard the Bells on Christmas
Day,” despite the use of his name as lyricist. He did write the poem “Christmas
Bells,” but an unknown reviser converted his personal poem into a universal
hymn.
The story begins in April of 1835. Longfellow was 28 and a
recognized American writer when he and Mary, his first wife, left Cambridge,
Mass., for a 20-month grand tour of Europe. In November, only eight months into
the tour, Mary died suddenly in Amsterdam. Longfellow continued his tour,
crisscrossing Europe, hoping to recover from the grief of his wife’s death.
The same November that Mary died, 19-year-old Fanny (Frances
Elizabeth) Appleton and her family left Boston to begin a 21-month grand tour
of Europe. Eight months later, in July 1836, Fanny’s father met Longfellow in
Switzerland. Fanny was not impressed by her father’s chance meeting. She
recorded in her journal of July 20, 1836: “Professor Longfellow sends up his
card to Father. Hope he venerable gentleman won’t pop in on us, though I did
like his Oure Mer.”
Fanny herself first met Henry at Interlaken, Switzerland, on
July 31. Henry plunged into a whirlwind courtship, and when he left three weeks
later she recorded:”[I] miss Mr. L. considerable.” Nevertheless, she remained
with her family in Europe for 12 more months.
Two years after her
return, Longfellow published Hyperion, a novel with Fanny as heroine and him as
hero, in which the hero wooed the heroine across Europe. The real-life heroine
was not amused by such public courtship. After Longfellow sent her a copy, she
wrote a personal review to a friend in August 1839. “There really are some
exquisite things in this book, though it is desultory, objectless, a thing of shreds
and patches like the author’s mind.” Miffed, Fanny snubbed Henry’s Boston
visits for the next four years. Henry busied himself with his duties as a
professor at Harvard.
But who knows the mind of an unmarried woman in New England
in the 1840s? Seven years after their first meeting, Fanny, now 26, suddenly
changed her mind about the 36-year-old Henry. A few days before her brother’s
departure for Europe, at a chance meeting in Cambridge, Fanny took the
initiative and mentioned to Henry how lonely she expected to be and added, “You
must come and comfort me, Mr. Longfellow.”
Henry came. Within a month she had accepted his proposal in
a handwritten note. They set the wedding day for the end of the school year.
Harvard and other colleges ended school much later in the 1840s, and the couple
was married in Cambridge on a beautiful summer day, the first day of Harvard
College’s vacation, July 13, 1843. Fanny’s father, a wealthy merchant, gave
them the well-known and historical Craigie House in Cambridge as a wedding
present.
The Craigie House became a home, their home. With marriage
came children. Henry recorded his reaction to his first child, Charles, in his
journal on June 9, 1844: “Thank Heaven! It is all over. He was born at one
o’clock today; and I came very near sending him out of the world as soon as he
had cleverly gotten into it; for, leaning over the bed to kiss Fanny, I nearly
put my elbow onto his little head, not seeing him there.”
Fanny recorded her first Christmas with Charles, Dec. 25,
1844: “If our Father in Heaven feels anything like the joy over his children we
have over our single one, what an infinity of happiness is his. I can now
better understand his long-suffering patience with our infirmities.”
Another son, Ernest, quickly followed. More than the usual
excitement accompanied the birth of their third child, their first girl, as
Fanny was the first North American woman to bear a child under the influence of
ether. Puritan New England was not pleased by this lifting of Eve’s curse.
Fanny wrote to her sister-in-law: “I am very sorry you all thought me so rash
and naughty in trying the ether. Henry’s faith gave me courage, and I had heard
such a thing had succeeded abroad, where the surgeons extend this blessing much
more boldly and universally than our timid doctors . . . . This is certainly
the greatest blessing of this age.”
Unfortunately, this baby, also named Fanny, lived only a
year. But soon the Longfellows had a family of five: two boys, Charley and
Ernest, and three girls, Alice, Edith, and Allegra. Henry’s domestic happiness
was full.
By 1860 both Longfellow and the nation were at a kind of
peak. “Evangeline,” “Hiawatha,” and “The Courtship of Miles Standish” had given
him fame; his wife and children had given him domestic happiness. The United
States was experiencing the settlement of the Midwest, the expansion to the
West, the voluminous exportation of cotton from the South, and the increased
industrial exports of the North.
But the winds of fate had begun to blow. Longfellow was to
see both the tranquility of his family and the tranquility of his country
shattered within the three months between April 12, 1861, and July 10, 1861.
Consider the following four extracts from his journal (emphasis has been added
throughout this article by italic type).
Nov. 7, 1860: “Lincoln is elected. Overwhelming majorities
in New York and Pennsylvania. This is a great victory, one can hardly overrate
its importance. It is the redemption of the country. Freedom is triumphant.”
Feb. 22, 1861: “Washington’s birthday. Heard the bells
ringing at sunrise, through the crimson eastern sky. They had a sad sound,
reminding one of the wretched treason in the land.”
On April 12, 1861, Longfellow and the nation reeled from the
unthinkable, a nation divided by civil war. He recorded: “News comes that Fort
Sumter is attached. And so the war begins! Who can forsee the end?”
June 19, 1861: “If one could only foresee one’s fate!”
On Tuesday, July 9, 1861, less than three months after Fort
Sumter’s fall had destroyed the nation’s peace, Fanny and Henry busied
themselves as usual in Craigie House. The Cambridge summer heat and humidity
were miserable. Only the day before Fanny had written: “We are all sighing for
the good sea breeze instead of this stifling land one filled with dust. If I
could have known the heat would last so long, I should have tried to get down a
week sooner. . . . Poor Annie [Allegra] is very droopy with the heat, and Edie
[Edith] has to get her hair in a net to free her neck from it’s weight.”
That Tuesday Henry was at work in the study next to the
library. Fanny, wearing a light summer dress, sat in the late summer afternoon
at a small table before an open window in the library. Edith, 7, and Allegra,
5, stood at their mother’s side. Earlier Fanny had tried to make Edie a bit
more comfortable in the unrelieved summer heat by trimming her hair.
Fanny took the trimmed curls of Edie’s summer-bleached hair
and lit a candle to melt a bar of sealing wax. She started to seal a set of the
curls in a small paper package. Drops of burning wax fell unnoticed on her
dress. Through the open window gusted the good sea breeze for which they had
been longing. Suddenly, the light material of her dress caught fire. In an
instant, she was wrapped in a sheet of flame. Trying to protect the two girls,
she ran with a piercing cry to the study next door where Henry sat. He sprang
up, grabbed a throw rug from the floor, and threw it around her. It was too
small. She broke away, flew toward the entry, then turned and rushed back to him.
He embraced her, protecting her face and part of her body. Dreadfully burned,
she collapsed, she was carried to her room.
Henry first sent for the family’s Cambridge doctor, then for
a second Cambridge doctor, and finally for a doctor from Boston. In the hope of
reducing the shock, the doctors sedated both Fanny and Henry with ether. The
next morning, she woke for a few moments, slipped into a coma, and died from
the burns before ten o’clock.
Three days later, Saturday, July 13, 1861, on what would
have been their 18th wedding anniversary, the family held Fanny’s funeral in
the Craigie House library, the same room where the tragedy had occurred.
Longfellow, too ill from burns and grief to attend, could only listen from a
makeshift bed in the adjoining study.
Longfellow wrote nothing for months, and nothing ever of the
ninth and tenth of July 1861. When one visitor expressed hope that Longfellow
would bear his cross patiently, he responded, “Bear the cross, yea; but what if
one is stretched on it?” The burns on his face made it impossible for him to
shave, and he grew the full beard that people today think he had always worn.
Like all citizens, Longfellow had experienced the loss of
national peace with the outbreak of the Civil War. But now he had also experienced
the loss of personal peace, had felt it dying within his own arms. Could he
regain Eden, or did he have to experience more before receiving a catharsis?
These extracts from his journal help to tell the story.
Dec. 25, 1861: [The
first Christmas after Fanny’s death.] “How inexpressibly sad are all holidays!”
May 8, 1862: [The reasons for the Civil War were never far
from his mind.] “I saw lately at a jeweler’s a slave’s collar of iron, with an
iron tongue as large as a spoon to go into the mouth. Every drop of blood in me
quivered! The world forgets what slavery really is!”
July 10, 1862: [The first anniversary of Fanny’s death.] “I
can make no record of those days. Better leave them wrapped in silence. Perhaps
some day God will give me peace.”
Sept. 1, 1862: [The War did not leave him alone.] “I thought
in the night of the pale upturned faces of young men dead on the battlefield,
and the agonies of the wounded, and my wretchedness was very great. Every shell
from the cannon’s mouth bursts not only on the battle-field, but in far-away
homes, North and South, carrying dismay and death.”
Dec. 25, 1862: [His second Christmas without Fanny.] “’A
merry Christmas’ say the children, but that is no more for me.”
During the third Christmas season he experienced the war
personally.
Dec. 1, 1863: “At dinner received a telegram from Washington
stating that Charles [their oldest son who had run away to join the Union army]
had been severely wounded.”
Dec. 3, 1863: “. . . went in pursuit of Charles.”
Dec. 4, 1863: “No wounded arrive.”
Dec. 5, 1863: “The train came . . . [with] Charles. Charles
[is wounded] through both shoulders-an Enfield ball entering under the left
shoulder-blade and passing directly through the back, taking off one of the
spinal processes, and passing out under the right shoulder-blade.”
Dec. 8, 1863: “Leave for home with [Charles].”
Charles Longfellow
Dec. 9, 1863: “Reached home [with Charles].”
Longfellow made no journal record at all for this third
Christmas Day. But after the passage of another year, Longfellow records some
good news.
Nov. 10, 1864: “Lincoln re-elected beyond a doubt. We
breathe freer. The country will be saved.”
Finally, the fourth Christmas after Fanny’s death, the
fourth Christmas of the Civil War, on Christmas Day of 1864, in a burst
Longfellow wrote the seven-stanza “Christmas-Bells.” In it we see three years
of personal and national travail echoed.
The first three stanzas of “Christmas-Bells” capture the
peace that the United States and Longfellow had enjoyed before 1861. The fourth
and fifth stanzas are the dramatic break; the disappearance of Eden. The sixth
stanza is the natural personal response—despair—a despair that he and the
nation had undergone for three years. But today is Christmas: Charlie is home
from the war, Lincoln has been reelected, time has healed henry’s hurt heart.
In response, stanza seven is a statement of personal grace, a gift of optimism,
a personal revelation without details of hints as to how the Wrong will fail,
nor how the Right will prevail.
“Christmas-Bells” is a personal and particular poem, from a
particular time, for particular reasons. Written four months before the end of
the Civil War, it is a poem of trust—without particular knowledge of how things
will actually turn out.
Longfellow published
the poem in 1867, two years after the war ended. But about 1872, seven years
after the end of the Civil War, the poem appeared as a popular hymn set to
music. As had happened with other Longfellow poems, an unknown reviser had
converted the poem into a hymn. The conversion to “I Heard the Bells on
Christmas Day” was done by changing a word of stanza two, deleting the fourth
and fifth stanzas, and moving the third stanza to the end. The changes seem
small; the effect is immense.
In the reviser’s hymn, the first two stanzas take place
every Christmas Day. By 1872, the passage of 11 years since the start of the
Civil War had dulled the shock of the cannon’s roar for Americans, and the
poem’s fourth and fifth stanzas were deleted. The sixth stanza of the poem
became the third stanza of the hymn. For us, singing it 120 years later,
outside of any historical context, the hymn’s third stanza seems a personal
confession of despair at the failure of the Christian message referred to in
the first two stanzas.
The poem’s seventh stanza became the hymn’s fourth stanza
and now become a call to repentance, a call for optimism, a call to transcend
little local civil wars or tiny tragic personal deaths.
Longfellow had ended his poem with this seventh stanza. He
had not been bothered by the fact that the Civil War wasn’t over, nor by the
lack of details included within his personal faith that the Right would
prevail. His moment of personal grace had left him without doubt.
But people prefer the inevitable to the merely hoped. And
the reviser in 1872 had more than hope. The war was over. The future was clear.
The 1872 American audience lived after the time when night had turned to day,
when once again bells sang of peace on earth. So the poem’s third stanza was
made the hymn’s fifth stanza. The world had indeed revolved from night to day.
The personal, particular, dated elements of the poem, nearly
obscure by 1872, are now long gone. What some unknown hand designed for a
post-Civil War audience has mutated into a universal hymn for the late 20th
century.
CHRISTMAS BELLS (original)
I heard the bells on Christmas
Day
Their old, familiar carols play,
And wild and sweet
The words repeat
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
And thought how, as the day had come,
The belfries of all Christendom
Had rolled along
The unbroken song
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
Till ringing, singing on its way,
The world revolved from night to day,
A voice, a chime,
A chant sublime
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
Then from each black, accursed mouth
The cannon thundered in the South,
And with the sound
The carols drowned
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
It was as if an earthquake rent
The hearth-stones of a continent,
And made forlorn
The households born
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!
And in despair I bowed my head;
“There is no peace on earth,” I said;
“For hate is strong,
And mocks the song
Of peace on earth, good-will to men!”
Then pealed the bells more loud and deep:
“God is not dead, nor doth He sleep;
The Wrong shall fail,
The Right prevail,
With peace on earth, good-will to men.”
I HEARD THE BELLS ON CHRISTMAS DAY
I Heard
the Bells on Christmas Day
Their old familiar carols play,
And wild and sweet the
words repeat
Of peace on earth, good will to men.
I thought how, as the day had come,
The belfries of all Christendom
Had rolled along the unbroken song
Of peace on earth, good will to men.
And in despair I bowed my head:
“There is no peace on earth,” I said,
“For hate is strong and mocks the song
Of peace on earth, good will to men.”
Then pealed the bells more loud and deep:
“God is not dead, nor doth he sleep;
The wrong shall fail, the right prevail,
With peace on earth, good will to men.”
Till, ringing singing, on its way,
The world revolved from night to day,
A voice, a chime, a chant sublime,
Of peace on earth, good will to men!
link: A BEAUTIFUL ARRANGEMENT OF “I HEARD THE BELLS ON CHRISTMAS
DAY” (YouTube)
Thanks for sharing this article. I was looking for it. Do you know if it is published anywhere else or where you copied it from?
ReplyDeleteBy the way, Dr. Campbell was one of my professors. He loved this song so much that we sang I Heard the Bells on Christmas Day at his funeral.